November 2005 Archives

Is it wrong...

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Is it wrong for me to think that the silly names that the guys in U2 (except for Larry and that other guy) have given themselves is pretentious?


All Roads Lead to the Tower

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

I've just finished the fifth Dark Tower book by Stephen King, 'Wolves of the Calla', and now I'm jonesing for more. My recommendation to people is if you like Sci/Fi, Westerns, and Fantasy (or if you have a mix of two of those or like only one) then maybe you should read this series. Also maybe if you like Harry Potter. It's really good. It's not a Horror book. Also Marvel will be putting out some Dark Tower comics next year which is definately going to be on my subscription sheet at the comic store.


Totally Squinky

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Best Friend Birthday Weekend

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Although this is early Happy Birthday to Erik and Nina.


Java Top N List

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

So I've been working in the Java mine (of my own volition) and now I will grace you all with my thoughts on Java, several years after I first played[1] with it. At times this list may seem a little harsh, but in reality I'm really liking the experience.

[1] And I do seriously mean "played", about as far as I got was "Hello World" and "ooh look at all of those objects!"

  1. Semicolons. I've just come off of a python/ruby kick. Having to type in semicolons again is weird.

  2. Typing. Also I've been coming off of a Haskell kick. Although Java's type system is not nearly as strict as Haskell's it's nice for the compiler to catch some little errors. Actually Haskell's type system is like BDSM, real strict, real painful, but also really nice in a way.

  3. Arrays vs. Collections. In all of the languages that I like to work in arrays are out and indexed lists are in. Java shows off it's machine language roots (and its similarity to C) by advertising and making arrays what people use. Compounding this is that where Collections are concerned (and pretty much any container type thing that takes the global base Object class type) the collections are more like LISP lists. A programmer can put in whatever the hell he wants into them, defeating some of the niceness of having type checking in the first place. Make up your mind Java. Are you dynamically or statically typed?

  4. Version Numbers. The discrepancy JDK version numbers and Sun Marketing people's version numbers are just stupid. But really most version numbers are completely stupid anyway.

  5. Debugger. jdb is crap. And I'm not going to install Eclipse. Time to try out the new java enabled version of gdb.

  6. Interpreter/Shell/REPL thing. As said before my language progressing looks something like (but probably not quite) perl -> C -> PHP -> Bash -> Python -> Scheme -> Common Lisp -> Haskell -> Ruby -> Java. The path is very roundabout, but most of these languages have a Read, Evaluate, Print, Loop thing that allows a developer to run little snippets of code and get back results. This really is a language feature folks! Although I don't know how well Java would cope with it since it is built on verbosity.

  7. Enumerations. Mapping symbols to integers in code is so 1969. I only think Haskell, Lisp, and (maybe) Ruby do this nicely.

  8. Classes vs. Packages vs. Modules. Everything is packaged in a class even if it doesn't make an object. So maybe they should've been called MODULES. Also, long.package.names.are.really.annoying. Especially when they're mapped to directories and my command line wraps around the screen.

  9. Development tools. I was going to say something about this but I forget. Maybe it was something about the Java communities habit of rewriting things (like building Ant instead of using make.)

  10. Interfaces vs. mixins and multiple inheritance. Maybe my number one complaint. I've heard that multiple inheritance was cut out because it would be too complicated for the programmer. From reading how someone is suppose to write java code for stuff like mixins (pretty much a lot of boiler plate crap) I think it may be worth the complication.

  11. Modifying existing classes. A lot of the OO languages let the programmer muck with the guts of existing classes. Java does not. This seems to be another case of "other programmers are our enemies."

  12. Public, private, and protected. "Other programmers are our enemies" again. Python does the old school Internet way of trusting the user of a class or library. The Java way probably helps compilation in some way (also numbers 10 and 11 also probably do as well.)

  13. Core types vs. Objects. int is a core type in the language while Integer is a class type that wraps all of the OO goodness around the int core type. Because of this I've messed with way too much code that has to cast between these types of types. Yucky.


New Blogity Blog engine

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

I've left pyblosxom behind. It was very funky and didn't handle some crazy exceptional conditions my poorly coded plugins caused. I could very well blame myself, but I'd really like to have software that keeps going after a poor third party plugin goes apeshit.

Anyhow now I'm running a Javur engine called Blojsom that has worked pretty good on my laptop and behaves well in the event all of my plugins start breaking. Since it obeys the blosxom filesystem conventions it was easy to keep all of the existing entries. I just had to add a markdown parser so that it would render everything well.

Now if I only had some real things to blog about.

(Also: haha I broke http://www.poorsquinky.com with the new rss feed.)


San Francisco is odd in it's voting to me. Last year they voted no on taxing businesses, and this year they voted yes on giving money to roads and the City College.

But what really gripes me is that every election we have to deal with the ballot box budgeting. This time around it was about the Fire Stations. The poor firefighters have had to be cut back due to the city not having the money. They come up with the great idea to take the issue to the voters in a most devious way, set the number of fire departments and staffing levels in the city charter, a document that cannot be changed except by a majority vote of the electorate. So now we're stuck with this mandated level of fire departments, that will take money away from schools, Muni, and the police department. I'll be thinking of the fire fighters union when I get stabbed in the dark on a Muni bus.

What's next is that the police department will probably do the same thing and then we'll be stuck again. Or more likely on every election there will be an initiative to take this out of the charter.

http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2005/11/09/news/20051109_ne03_firehouses.txt

Oh yeah and now the people of this city don't care for the Constitution either.

http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2005/11/09/news/20051109_ne02_firearms.txt


About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 2005 listed from newest to oldest.

October 2005 is the previous archive.

December 2005 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

April 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.25